· 1/9/2008
Hinkle v. Gentry
Citations
- 529 F. Supp. 2d 281
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1715
- 2008 WL 96100
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- dismissing the plaintiff’s case when the plaintiff’s discovery abuse was “severe, virtually paralyzing the progress of the case”
- dismissing case due to pro se plaintiff’s failure to meet his discovery obligations
- dismissing case due to pro se plaintiff’s failure to meet his discovery obligations
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ponsor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.