Skip to main content
· 1/9/2008

Hinkle v. Gentry

Citations

  • 529 F. Supp. 2d 281
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1715
  • 2008 WL 96100

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing the plaintiff’s case when the plaintiff’s discovery abuse was “severe, virtually paralyzing the progress of the case”
  • dismissing case due to pro se plaintiff’s failure to meet his discovery obligations
  • dismissing case due to pro se plaintiff’s failure to meet his discovery obligations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ponsor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.