Hinkle v. Ball

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that section 1500 did not apply because “[i]t is undisputed that Plaintiff filed its complaint in this Court ap- proximately four hours before filing in federal district court”
• “[T]he Tohono O’odham majority ‘stated clearly’ that Tecon is not disturbed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).