Hinkle, Cox, Eaton, Coffield & Hensley v. Cadle Co. of Ohio, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court should attempt to distinguish between two types of work to the extent possible
• Affirming summary judgment on the ground that, absent fraud or mutual mistake, client could not challenge the reasonableness of attorney fees following payment because payment established the client’s assent to the amount and established an account stated.
• General Counsel qualified to testify with respect to the reasonableness of attorneys’ fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).