Hing Chuen Wu v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an immigration judge abused his No. 18‐3471 11 discretion “in relying upon [a] delay … as the sole reason for denying [a] motion for continuance”
• holding that an immigration judge abused his No. 18‐3471 11 discretion “in relying upon [a] delay … as the sole reason for denying [a] motion for continuance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).