Hinesburg Sand & Gravel Co. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that \[s]tanding doctrine is fundamentally rooted in respect for the separation of powers of the independent branches of government.\
• recognizing that “[standing doctrine is fundamentally rooted in respect for the separation of powers of the independent branches of government.”
• explaining that case-or-controversy requirement “embodies various doctrines, including standing, mootness, ripeness and political question, that help define and limit the role of courts in a democratic society”
• “Standing doctrine is fundamentally rooted in respect for the separation of powers of the independent branches of government.”
• looking to scope of rights under Equal Protection Clause to conclude plaintiff lacked standing
• noting at 340–41 that “[o]ne of the ‘passive virtues’ of the standing doctrine is to promote judicial restraint by limiting the occasions for judicial intervention into the political process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).