Skip to main content
· 8/20/1986

Hines v. United States (In Re Hines)

Citations

  • 63 B.R. 731
  • 15 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 959
  • 1986 Bankr. LEXIS 5487
  • 14 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1007

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “unconscionable under Section 294f(g)(2) requires a higher standard than a finding of undue hardship”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peder K. Ecker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.