Hines v. Potomac Electric Power Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the language of the statute “is clear and unambiguous in requiring the reduction of PIP and UM benefits to the extent that the recipient has recovered [WC] benefits”
• noting that the predecessor statute to Ins. § 19-513(e) is “clear and unambiguous in requiring the reduction of PIP and UM benefits to the extent that the recipient has recovered [workers’ compensation] benefits”
• “Clearly, insurers are free to provide more than the minimum benefits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).