Skip to main content
· 4/21/1983

Hines v. Plante

Citations

  • 661 P.2d 880
  • 99 Nev. 259
  • 1983 Nev. LEXIS 435

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a party seeking a receivership must show that it is likely that it would be entitled to a judgment in the underlying action
  • noting that a receiver should not be appointed when the party who \contributed the bulk of the monies used to finance the . . . enterprise\ opposed it
  • observing that the decision to appoint a receiver is within the district court's discretion
  • contention on appeal must be supported by evidence in the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.