Hines v. Mizell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding in a coverage dispute where “claim” was undefined that the plaintiffs’ actions did not rise to “an assertion of legally cognizable damage, . . . a type of demand that can be defended, settled and paid by the insurer” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).