Hines v. Dept. of Labor & Emp. SEC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellant's refusal to comply with foreman's legitimate work order is in itself sufficient to constitute misconduct connected with work
• district court must affirm where competent, substantial evidence supports appeals referee's decision that employee's actions — insubordinate and offensive challenge of foreman's authority in presence of other employees — constituted misconduct
• employee's belligerent refusal to comply with his foreman's legitimate work order constituted misconduct
• referee's findings are affirmed on appeal if supported by competent substantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).