Hines v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[t]o obtain relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3, a petitioner must demonstrate that the alleged error or abuse could not adequately and effectively be remedied through the normal appellate process or through some other available method of review”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rasten v. Northeastern University
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-07-12· cited 41×
• Matthews v. D'Arcy
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-07-09· cited 32×
• Murray v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-08-10· cited 22×
• Bates v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2001-07-17· cited 9×
• Sinai v. Plymouth Division of Probate & Family Court Department
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-07-09· cited 6×
• Hines
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-07-12· cited 6×
• Jaynes v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-05-08· cited 6×
• Hines v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-07-03· cited 4×
• Soura
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-03-12· cited 3×
• Murray v. Massachusetts Parole Board
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2008-04-15· cited 2×
• Murray v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2009-12-23· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Fogarty v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1989-11-16· cited 79×
• McGuinness v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1995-06-12· cited 58×
• DuPont v. Superior Court
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1987-11-10· cited 15×
• Caggiano v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1990-02-26· cited 11×
• Simmons v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-10-04· cited 3×