Skip to main content
· 12/17/1998

Hinds Community College Dist. v. Muse

Citations

  • 725 So. 2d 207
  • 1998 WL 879082

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the injury is to the public’s perception of Hinds Community College, its administration and its faculty. By employing his wife, Dr. Muse presented an appearance of improper self-dealing. He appeared to use his public office to obtain pecuniary benefit for himself and his wife.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, P.J., McRae and Mills

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.