Hindquarter Corp. v. Property Development Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that right to declare forfeiture and right to refuse renewal are distinct
• landlord not entitled to fees for prevailing in litigation regarding lease renewal because contract provided fees only for curing defaults
• landlord not entitled to fees for prevailing in litigation regarding lease renewal because contract only provided fees for curing defaults.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Corbray v. Stevenson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1982-12-22· cited 31×
• Donald B. Murphy Contractors, Inc. v. State
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-03-14· cited 13×
• Atlas Supply, Inc. v. Realm, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-08-20· cited 13×
• Glesener v. Balholm
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-12-17· cited 11×
• R. R. Gable, Inc. v. Burrows
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1982-08-04· cited 9×
• Faulkner v. Farnsworth
  Utah Supreme Court· 1986-02-24· cited 8×
• Vice v. Leigh
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1995-11-30· cited 7×
• Hieb v. Jelinek
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-02-23· cited 6×
• Lenci v. Owner
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-12-28· cited 5×
• Homstead Enterprises v. Johnson Products, Inc.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1988-04-26· cited 5×
• Thrifty Dutchman, Inc. v. Florida Supermarkets, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-01-17· cited 4×
• Belfor USA Group, Inc. v. Thiel
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-06-14· cited 1×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Washington State Bar Ass'n v. Great Western Union Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
  Washington Supreme Court· 1978-11-16· cited 84×
• Pannell v. Thompson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1979-02-01· cited 67×
• Nork v. Pacific Coast Medical Enterprises, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1977-09-15· cited 28×
• Lutterloh v. Patterson
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1947-06-09· cited 20×
• Puget Investment Co. v. Wenck
  Washington Supreme Court· 1950-07-20· cited 16×
• Klepper v. Hoover
  California Court of Appeal· 1971-11-22· cited 16×
• Toellner v. McGinnis
  Washington Supreme Court· 1909-10-29· cited 16×
• Keene v. Zindorf
  Washington Supreme Court· 1914-08-11· cited 13×
• Skillman v. Lynch
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1951-12-28· cited 12×
• Behrman v. Barto
  California Supreme Court· 1880-07-01· cited 10×
• Jones v. Epstein
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1918-06-10· cited 10×
• Spotts v. Westlake Garage Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1921-07-07· cited 8×
• Henry v. Bruhn & Henry, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1921-01-19· cited 5×

Other cases named Hindquarter Corp. v. Property Development Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Hindquarter Corp. v. Property Development Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-01-21