Hinckley v. Bluehill Granite Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the work performed by the subcontractor’s employees was not a regular part of the company’s business, but concluding that the company was a principal contractor because the work performed was the same type usually performed by the company’s employees
• explaining that “[wjhether work is a regular part of the business of any entity is a fact-specific inquiry ... relative to the size and scope of the business”
• “Whether work is a regular part of the business of any entity is a fact-specific inquiry, relative to the size and scope of the business.”
• worker injured while splicing cable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).