Hinckley v. Ayres
Citations
- 105 Cal. 357
- 38 P. 735
- 1895 Cal. LEXIS 665
Syllabus
<p>Marriage Without Solemnization—Evidence. —There can be no mutual assumption of marital rights, duties, and obligations, within the meaning of section 55 of the Civil Code, so as to constitute a marriage without solemnization, unless the parties live together as husband and wife, treat each other in the usual way with married people, and so conduct themselves as to have full repute among their intimate friends and associates to be husband and wife. Tested by this rule, held, that the evidence sustained the finding of the trial court that the appellant and the deceased did not live together as husband and wife.</p>
Judges: McFarland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court· 1960-08-12· cited 134×
- Hamby v. J. R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 32×
- In re Estate of BlytheCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-07-12· cited 16×
- Miller v. SutherlandMontana Supreme Court· 1957-04-03· cited 13×
- Daniels v. MohonSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1960-01-12· cited 10×
- Davis v. HinckleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-11-30· cited 10×
- Cotgias v. BurkettCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1937-10-20· cited 4×
- Freiburghaus v. FreiburghausIdaho Court of Appeals· 1982-11-15· cited 4×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.