Himmelman v. Henry
Citations
- 84 Cal. 104
- 23 P. 1098
- 1890 Cal. LEXIS 769
Syllabus
<p>Ejectment — Special Defenses — Findings — Appeal from Judgment— Presumption. —When the findings in an action of ejectment sustain all the material allegations of the complaint as against the denials of the answer, but do not pass upon special defenses set up in the answer, and the appeal is upon the judgment roll alone, without any statement of the evidence or bill of exceptions, it will not be presumed, against the correctness of the judgment, that there was any evidence in support of the special defenses, and the judgment will not be reversed for failure to find thereupon.</p> <p>Appeal — Findings — Support of Judgment—Failure to Find upon Issue — Want of Evidence. —-The findings of the court must be sufficient to support the judgment, and must contain nothing inconsistent with it; but a failure to find upon an issue, a finding upon which would merely have the effect of invalidating a judgment fully supported by the findings made, will not be held ground for reversal, unless it is shown by statement or bill of exceptions that evidence was submitted in relation to such issue.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that in Hutcherson v. Durden, 113 Ga. 987, 989–90 (39 SE 495) (1901
- noting that Georgia has codified the common-law principle that personal injury claims cannot be assigned
- noting that, although “[a] claim of legal malpractice may . . . sound in tort,” a legal malpractice action “based upon the breach of a duty imposed by the contract of employment between the attorney and the client” generally “sounds in contract”
- distinguishing Welch and holding insurer contractually sub-rogated to “all rights and remedies” could maintain breach of contract action against party to subrogor’s contract
- collecting cases and reasoning that “personal torts” and “injuries done to the person” are “all actionable injuries to the individual himself,” including injury to the body or to the reputation, in contrast to injury done to property
- “The legislative enactment of a statute is a conclusive expression of public policy. . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beatty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.