Skip to main content
· 2/2/1972

Hilton v. Maddox, Bishop, Hayton Frame & Trim Contractors, Inc.

Citations

  • 188 S.E.2d 167
  • 125 Ga. App. 423
  • 1972 Ga. App. LEXIS 1359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suit would be valid as a pending action upon which the plaintiff could proceed if, though late, service had been perfected before the running of the statute
  • suit would be valid as a pending action upon which the plaintiff could proceed if, though late, service had been perfected before the running of the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eberhardt, Bell, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.