Hilton v. Kerry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that questions of law are reviewed de novo and factual findings are reviewed for clear error
• applying principles of non-inquiry and declining to apply the \theoretical Gallina exception\ but providing no suggestion of a jurisdictional bar
• “No court has yet applied such a theoretical Gallina exception. . . . [W]e decline to apply such an exception.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).