Skip to main content
· 10/29/1895

Hilton v. City of St. Louis

Citations

  • 63 Mo. App. 179
  • 1895 Mo. App. LEXIS 166

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding substantial evidence supports the Commission’s findings that the employee was disabled and entitled to TTD benefits
  • defining substantial evidence as that “which, considering the record as a whole, would allow reasonable minds to reach the conclusion the administrative agency reached”
  • stating there is “no precedent ... that a constructive refusal of light duty could defeat a claim for temporary total disability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rombauer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.