Hilton Oil Transp. v. Oil Transp. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that facts showing a shareholder’s operating his company in a “loose and haphazard manner” does “not justify the imposition of personal liability against [the shareholder]”
• finding that shared officers and a common office were insufficient to pierce the corporate veil
• concluding insufficient competent substantial evidence existed to disregard the corporate form, even though several corporate entities had “overlapping owners, officers and/or directors” and “shared the same office, address, and telephone number”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).