Hilsdorf v. Commissioner of Social Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the report of a non-examining physician could not, standing on its own, support ALJ’s RFC determination (citing Vargas, 898 F.2d at 296)
• instructing that, in determining a claimant’s RFC, the ALJ’s determination must be “based on the evidence available in the case record”
• finding that the ALJ’s failure to further develop the record upon statement of counsel that the record was complete was error
• stating that an ALJ who makes an RFC determination that is unsupported by substantial evidence has improperly substituted his own opinion for that of a physician
• stating that an ALJ who makes an RFC determination that is unsupported by substantial evidence has improperly substituted his own opinion for that of a physician
• stating that an ALJ who makes an RFC determination that is unsupported by substantial evidence has improperly substituted his own opinion for that of a physician

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).