Hillsborough County v. Henderson
Citations
- 45 Fla. 356
Syllabus
<p>1. Counties desiring to issue bonds must comply with the statutory' provisions regulating such issue.</p> <p>2. A resolution for the issuance of bonds by a county, which stipulates that the bonds shall bear not more than four per cent, interest per annum, without fixing a definite rate, is not in compliance with the statutory requirement that the resolution determine the rate of interest to be paid.</p> <p>3. Assuming that a resolution for county bonds for two designated purposes, under section 591 of the Revised Statutes, should state the amount of bonds required for each purpose, a resolution providing for a gross amount of bonds for the two purposes is sufficient in this respect where one of the purposes is the funding of the indebtedness of the county.</p> <p>4. The statutory authority' to issue bonds given counties by sections 591 et seq. Rev. Stats, includes the right to make the bonds payable in gold coin of the United States of the present standard weight and fineness. •</p>
Judges: Maxwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Stern v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1909-06-19· cited 52×
- City of Oswego v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas· 1916-02-23· cited 19×
- Cranor v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-06-15· cited 17×
- Cheves v. First National BankSupreme Court of Florida· 1920-01-23· cited 17×
- City of Cheyenne v. State ex rel. RollinsWyoming Supreme Court· 1908-06-26· cited 12×
- High v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida· 1906-01-15· cited 11×
- Elliott v. Tillamook CountyOregon Supreme Court· 1917-11-27· cited 11×
- Luhrs v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court· 1928-01-16· cited 5×
- State v. County of SarasotaSupreme Court of Florida· 1963-07-29· cited 5×
- L'Engle v. HolmesSupreme Court of Florida· 1913-02-18· cited 2×
- Kearney v. County of St. LucieSupreme Court of Florida· 1961-01-09· cited 1×
- Berrien County v. PaulkSupreme Court of Georgia· 1921-01-13· cited 1×
- Richmond Trust Co. v. Charlotte CountyS.D. Florida· 1924-07-02· cited 1×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Burnett v. MaloneyTennessee Supreme Court· 1896-11-14· cited 48×
- Skinner v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-06-22· cited 33×
- City of Tampa v. SalomonsonSupreme Court of Florida· 1895-01-15· cited 22×
- Smith v. Mayor of DublinSupreme Court of Georgia· 1901-07-19· cited 20×
- Farson, Leach & Co. v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1895-03-14· cited 12×
- State ex rel. Gardner v. RoggenNebraska Supreme Court· 1887-07-15· cited 7×
- Kenyon v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court· 1897-04-28· cited 6×
- Cincinnati, Wabash, & Michigan Railroad v. WellsIndiana Supreme Court· 1872-05-15· cited 6×
- Woodruff v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1889-04-15· cited 6×
- Packwood v. County of KittitasWashington Supreme Court· 1896-06-29· cited 5×
- Pollard v. City of Pleasant HillU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri· 1873-11-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.