Skip to main content
· 3/2/1984

Hills v. Aronsohn

Citations

  • 152 Cal. App. 3d 753
  • 199 Cal. Rptr. 816
  • 1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 1704

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A] motion for summary judgment should not be granted where reasonable minds could draw different conclusions from the evidence presented.”
  • substance or object that is intentionally introduced into the body for therapeutic purposes is not a \foreign object\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.