Skip to main content
· 12/29/1992

Hills Materials Company v. Donald B. Rice, Secretary of the Air Force

Citations

  • 982 F.2d 514
  • 38 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,454
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 33968

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • mandating that, “[w]herever possible, words of a contract should be given their ordinary and common meaning.”
  • emphasizing that every government contract must be read as a whole and that the P&R clause must be applied in a manner that accounts for all provi- sions of the agreement between the parties
  • emphasizing that every government contract must be read as a whole and that the P & R clause must be applied in a manner that accounts for all provisions of the agreement between the parties
  • interpreting contract to incorporate safety regulations extant when contract was signed and to shift responsibility for costs incurred as a result of new safety regulations to the Government
  • interpreting contract to incorporate safety regulations extant when contract was signed and to shift responsibility for costs incurred as a result of new safety regulations to the Government
  • construing an ambiguous contract clause against the government where the government had drafted the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mayer, Friedman, Clevenger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.