Skip to main content
· 9/11/2009

Hills Bank & Trust Co. v. Converse

Citations

  • 772 N.W.2d 764
  • 2009 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 109
  • 2009 WL 2951919

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the court will not consider an issue raised for the first time in the appellant’s reply brief
  • holding court of appeals decision stood on issues not addressed on further review
  • exercising discretion to review only one issue raised on appeal in a further review case
  • explaining the court will not consider an issue raised for the first time in the appellant’s reply brief
  • exercising discretion to address one issue on further review while letting the court of appeals’ opinion stand as the final decision on all remaining issues
  • stating we have the discretion to limit our review to any issue raised on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.