Skip to main content
· 11/27/1899

Hillman v. Griffin

Citations

  • 6 Cal. Unrep. 354
  • 59 P. 194
  • 1899 Cal. LEXIS 1181

Syllabus

<p>Attachment—Collateral Attack.—Evidence to Impeach an Affidavit of attachment is not admissible in a collateral proceeding by a stranger to the attachment suit to recover possession of the property.1</p> <p>Appeal.—Where There is a Substantial Conflict in the evidence, the finding of the trial court will not be disturbed.</p> <p>Replevin.—Defendant Seized in Attachment Certain Stock which plaintiff claimed to have purchased from the defendant in attachment. Plaintiff’s statement that he purchased the stock and had been in continued possession for some years prior to the attachment was uncontradicted. Held, he was entitled to recover such stock, although it happened to be, at the time of the levy of attachment, on the ranch of defendant in attachment.</p>

Judges: Dyke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.