Skip to main content
· 3/6/1997

Hillis v. State, Dept. of Ecology

Citations

  • 932 P.2d 139

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deferring to the Department of Ecology's determination that watershed assessments are an appropriate means of evaluating water permits
  • finding under 570(4) that the agency had a duty to process groundwater rights applications and failed to do so
  • finding under 570(4) that the agency had a duty to process groundwater rights applications and failed to do so
  • court will not order expenditures to meet statutory requirements legislature has chosen not to fund

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Guy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.