Skip to main content

Hilliard v. Jacobs

Citations

  • 916 N.E.2d 689
  • 2009 Ind. App. LEXIS 2442
  • 2009 WL 3817452

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “any order that requires the payment of a sum of money and states the specific amount due, whether labeled as a mandate or a civil money judgment, is a ‘judgment for money’” (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mathias, Robb, Darden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.