Hilliard v. Henry Rose Mercantile & Mfg. Co.
Citations
- 120 La. 364
- 45 So. 278
- 1907 La. LEXIS 656
Syllabus
<p>Appeal — Review—Conflicting Evidence.</p> <p>In an action for damages for personal injuries, where the evidence is conflicting, the conclusions of the trial judge on questions of fact are entitled to great weight.</p> <p>TEd. Note. — For cases in point, see Cent. Dig. vol. 3, Appeal and Error, §§ 3983-3989.]</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to 35 consider statements “in a vacuum” and looking, instead, to “remarks surrounding the purportedly false or misleading statements”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Land
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.