Hillery v. Pulley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the petitioner’s statistical evidence and analysis “make out a prima facie case of intentional discrimination” and further finding that “[o]nce a prima facie showing is made out, the burden of proof [shifts] to the State to dispel the inference of intentional discrimination.”
• calling the magnitude of change after the discriminatory practice “a matter of subjective perception” and finding the evidence to be only “further circumstantial evidence of discriminatory intent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).