Skip to main content
· 7/5/1984

Hiller v. Murphy

Citations

  • 600 F. Supp. 14
  • 54 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6183
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he dispositive question is whether the information [defendant] allegedly obtains plausibly constitutes a scan of face geometry.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shoob

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.