Hillard v. Medtronic, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that overwhelming Pennsylvania authority supports the principle that a court sitting in equity may reform or \blue pencil” or \blue-line” a non-competition covenant
• stating that evidence in the record demonstrated that the former employee was actively soliciting the former employer's customers
• stating that evidence in the record demonstrated that the former employee was actively soliciting the former employer's customers
• former employee “is not prohibited from competing ‘in any manner’ with Medtronic, he is restricted only from involvement with certain products on which he worked within the prior two-year period when he was employed by Medtronic.”
• former employee “is not prohibited from competing ‘in any manner’ with Medtronic, he is restricted only from involvement with certain products on which he worked within the prior two-year period when he was employed by Medtronic.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).