Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 1/19/2000

Hillabrand v. Drypers Corp.

Citations

  • 87 Ohio St. 3d 517

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the trial court erred in dismissing an action without allowing the non-moving party to respond, as allowed by procedural rules
  • “[a] ‘reasonable opportunity to defend against dismissal’ … contemplates that a trial court allow the party opposing dismissal the opportunity to respond at least within the time frame allowed by the procedural rules of the court”
  • “[a] ‘reasonable opportunity to defend against dismissal’ * * * contemplates that a trial court allow the party opposing dismissal the opportunity to respond at least within the time frame allowed by the procedural rules of the court”
  • reversing a default judgment imposed under Civ.R. 37(D
  • involving a motion for sanctions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Hillabrand v. Drypers Corp.

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.