Hill v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiff was “hardly unaware of an obligation to proceed expeditiously,” not entitled to equitable tolling, even if applicable to the FAA, and that plaintiff’s motion to vacate was untimely
• concluding that there were no extraordinary circumstances beyond plaintiff’s control
• reasoning that “delivery” meant “date of mailing” based on definition in FINRA Code
• noting that the First Circuit has explained that “undue means . . . describes underhanded or conniving ways of procuring an award that are similar to corruption or fraud, but do not precisely constitute either”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).