Court of Appeals of Texas· 6/24/1966
Hill v. W. E. Brittain, Inc.
Citations
- 405 S.W.2d 803
- 1966 Tex. App. LEXIS 2948
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is in instances where parties or the attorneys fail to make an appearance and participate in a hearing affecting their rights that an examination of the technical aspects of the rules of service and notice are and should be closely examined and adhered to.”
- \It is in instances where parties or the attorneys fail to make an appearance and participate in a hearing affecting their rights that an examination of the technical aspects of the rules of service and notice are and should be closely examined and adhered to.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Langdon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In re FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2014-04-30· cited 89×
- Langdale v. VillamilCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1991-06-27· cited 67×
- Poland v. OttTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2009-01-22· cited 65×
- Ocean Transport, Inc. v. Greycas, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1994-06-30· cited 52×
- Spiegel v. StrotherTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2008-08-14· cited 31×
- Goforth v. BradshawTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2009-09-04· cited 30×
- Netherland v. WittnerCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1983-12-08· cited 28×
- Kinetics, Inc. v. El Paso Products Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-10-19· cited 27×
- Street v. HedgepathDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-06-23· cited 24×
- St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital v. PolandTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2009-02-06· cited 20×
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1976-03-03· cited 19×
- Northeast Texas Staffing v. RayTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2010-11-23· cited 19×
- Boddy v. CanteauCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1969-05-07· cited 19×
- Cox v. Realty Development Corp.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1988-03-14· cited 18×
- Ussery v. Ewell Hodges, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1967-06-29· cited 17×
- Washington v. Related Arbor Court, LLCTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2011-10-28· cited 16×
- Butler v. TaylorTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1998-09-03· cited 13×
- Hatcher v. MewbournCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1970-07-21· cited 13×
- Sloan v. RiversCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1985-07-17· cited 13×
- Rash v. WhisennandCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1970-03-18· cited 11×
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Solana v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1961-06-30· cited 107×
- Baumler v. HazelwoodTexas Supreme Court· 1961-05-31· cited 92×
- Fox v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1961-03-01· cited 36×
- Kuehn v. KuehnTexas Commission of Appeals· 1922-06-24· cited 33×
- Waco Drug Co. v. HensleyTexas Commission of Appeals· 1931-02-04· cited 28×
- Bachman Center Corporation v. SaleCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1962-06-22· cited 24×
- Kone v. Security Finance Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1958-05-21· cited 19×
- Texas Crushed Stone Company v. WeeksCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1965-05-05· cited 18×
- Kirkpatrick v. RaggioCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1958-12-12· cited 16×
- Merchant's Fast Motor Lines, Inc. v. J. R. LaneFifth Circuit· 1958-11-21· cited 11×
- Freeman v. HarkriderCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1959-01-19· cited 10×
- Holmes v. CooleyCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1957-12-11· cited 10×
- Sneed v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1956-07-06· cited 9×
- Firestone v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1940-09-27· cited 8×
- Thompson v. Twin City Lumber & Shingle Co.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1949-03-17· cited 6×
- Lewis v. MerrillCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1956-10-23· cited 4×
- Manley v. RazienCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1943-06-14· cited 3×
- Baumler v. HazelwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1960-07-22· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.