Hill v. U.S. Department of Defense

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting motion to amend where the \proposed amended complaint ... [did] not meaningfully expand or alter the scope of [the plaintiff's] claims\ and the defendant did \not argue that any prejudice resulted from [the] plaintiff's failure to seek to amend earlier.\
• granting motion to amend where the “proposed amended complaint . . . [did] not meaningfully expand or alter the scope of [the plaintiff’s] claims” and the defendant did “not argue that any prejudice resulted from [the] plaintiff’s failure to seek to amend earlier.”
• plaintiff not required to quantify specific pecuniary harms to “survive a Rule 12(b)(6) . . . motion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).