Skip to main content
· 5/18/1936

Hill v. United States Ex Rel. Wampler

Citations

  • 298 U.S. 460
  • 56 S. Ct. 760
  • 80 L. Ed. 1283
  • 1936 U.S. LEXIS 716

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a warrant of commitment, containing terms inserted by a clerk, void for not conforming to the judgment of the court
  • noting that “there is a remedy by motion to correct” an inaccurate judgment
  • explaining, “[i]n any collateral inquiry, a court will close its ears to a suggestion that the sentence entered in the minutes is something other than the authentic expression of the sentence of the judge”
  • “[t]he only sentence known to the law is the sentence or judgment entered upon the records of the court”
  • “The only sentence known to the law is the sentence or judgment entered upon the records of the court.”
  • “The only sentence known to the law is the sentence of judgement entered upon the records of the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cardozo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.