Hill v. United States Department of the Interior

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the use of thermal-imaging technology to detect heat inside a private home violates the Fourth Amendment
• holding that the use of thermal-imaging technology to detect heat inside a private home violates the Fourth Amendment
• holding that use of a thermal imaging device to measure heat escaping from a residence constitutes a search of the residence
• holding that an officer’s use of a thermal-imaging device from a public street to detect relative amounts of heat inside the home was a search
• holding that “a Fourth Amendment search does not occur” where society is unwilling to recognize the subjective expectation of privacy as reasonable
• holding that using warrantless thermal imaging to show activity inside a home violated the Fourth Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).