Hill v. Trailmobile, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that Dawejko held that “the product-line exception ... may only be applied when the [Ray factors] have each been established” (emphasis in original)
• stating that the “the underlying policy concerns which prompted adoption” of the product line exception are to “be understood and used as a guideline in its application.”
• explaining that “[pjlaintiffs injured by products manufactured by predecessor corporations purchased by multiple corporations, or which shared no identity of corporate structure were, unfortunately, left without a remedy in strict liability”
• “Erie guesses” most difficult area of diversity jurisdiction after weighing federalism concerns
• reviewing Pennsylvania’s adoption of the product line exception
• the exception not to be read too tightly

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).