Skip to main content
· 1/16/2024

Hill v. The Div. of Soc. Servs.

Syllabus

Medicaid caretaker relative regulatory interpretation irreconcilable conflict

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no error where informant’s testimony at trial “ruled out the possibility that the [informant’s] testimony could somehow be helpful to [the defendant]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.