Skip to main content
· 5/19/2009

Hill v. Stowers

Citations

  • 680 S.E.2d 66
  • 224 W. Va. 51
  • 2009 W. Va. LEXIS 46

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there are “procedures in place” that “constitute the mechanism by which the Legislature has sought” to enforce the public policy at issue, and that “criminal statutes” are relevant in determining that there are other mechanisms available
  • quoting, in part, State ex rel. McGraw v. Scott Runyan Pontiac-Buick, Inc., 194 W.Va. 770, 461 S.E.2d 516 (1995)
  • quoting, in part, State ex rel. McGraw v. Scott Runyan Pontiac-Buick, Inc., 194 W.Va. 770, 461 S.E.2d 516 (1995)
  • finding no private right of action for election fraud where “comprehensive and detailed scheme” existed to contest elections
  • declining to create a new private cause of action for political opponents of individuals who committed election fraud
  • no private cause of action under W. Va.Code §§ 3-8-11, 3-9-12 or 3-9-13, for one who alleges that he lost election as the result of unlawful vote-buying

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: MeHUGH, Moats

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.