Hill v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing burglary conviction where “the only evidence implicating [the appellant] were the fingerprints, and the State failed to show that the prints could only have been made at the time of the crime”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Miranda v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-02-27· cited 2×
• Cordero-Artigas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-12-09· cited 2×
• L.A.R. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-01-16
• C.P.C. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-10-30

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Law
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1989-07-27· cited 545×
• Ballard v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-02-23· cited 38×
• Wilkerson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1970-02-27· cited 19×
• Mutcherson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-06-27· cited 11×