Hill v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that testimony regarding victim’s prior inconsistent statements offered to rebut her credibility was inadmissible because it violated the rape-shield statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Butler v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-06-13· cited 36×
• Holland v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2014-11-12· cited 8×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gaines v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-06-28· cited 28×
• McKenzie v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2000-02-23· cited 9×
• Lindsey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1996-07-03· cited 6×