Hill v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the officer could not do so and noting that the circumstances the officer identified as prompting the stop were insufficient to establish reasonable suspicion
• declining to find reasonable suspicion of criminal activity based on a vehicle’s driving away from the scene in an “unremarkable fashion”
• “reasonable suspicion of criminal activity is not established simply because a defendant leaves the scene when an officer nears.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jerry Weakley v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-06-07· cited 1×
• Thomas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-08-08
• State of Florida v. Kevin Tyson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-03-06

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Illinois v. Wardlow
  Supreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 4,162×
• Errickson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-08· cited 19×
• Ikner v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-10· cited 18×
• Huffman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-08-24· cited 17×
• Brye v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-07· cited 16×
• Beahan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-08-05· cited 9×
• F.E.A. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-08· cited 9×
• Panter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-05-07· cited 7×
• Hewlett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-06-03· cited 6×
• Cunningham v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-22· cited 5×
• L.N.D. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-13· cited 4×
• Paff v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-13· cited 3×