Hill v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that “[t]he intent to defraud can be proven circumstantially upon proof of the accused’s knowledge that the instrument is a forgery”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Okonkwo, Chidiebele Gabriel
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-05-15· cited 181×
• Rushton v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1985-06-06· cited 23×
• Buitureida v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1984-11-29· cited 18×
• Casterline v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1987-08-28· cited 17×
• Adams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1987-12-16· cited 15×
• Kemper v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1982-10-20· cited 9×
• Martinez-Macias v. Collins
  W.D. Texas· 1991-11-06· cited 5×
• Taylor v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1984-03-29· cited 5×
• Dukes v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1987-11-18· cited 5×
• Peterson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-12-16· cited 4×
• Mendieta v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-10-12· cited 4×
• Sheffield v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-12-09· cited 2×
• Jeffery N. Rucks v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2014-11-25
• in Re J. Allan Goddard
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2010-07-21

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Simmons v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-01-26· cited 71×
• Stuebgen v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-02-23· cited 71×
• Wilson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-05-23· cited 58×
• Pfleging v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-05-10· cited 50×
• Shannon v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-06-21· cited 49×
• Patella v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1927-04-27· cited 3×