Hill v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• permitting consideration of a defendant's control or discretionary use of funds raised by others when determining indigency
• permitting consideration of a defendant’s control or discretionary use of funds raised by others when determining indigency
• in determining indigency, court may consider, among other factors, whether appellant \has control or complete discretionary use of funds raised by others for his defense\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Sabino v. Genchi Ozuna
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2019-06-07· cited 58×
• State v. Vincent
  Utah Supreme Court· 1994-10-21· cited 48×
• Rodriguez v. Eighth Judicial District Court of State of Nevada
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2004-12-09· cited 27×
• Beyer v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-01-29· cited 14×
• Ragsdale v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-06-22· cited 7×
• State v. Vincent
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1992-12-18· cited 5×
• Sabino v. Ozuna
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2019-06-07· cited 4×
• Rodriguez v. Dist. Ct.
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2004-12-09· cited 2×
• Brewer v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1999-05-19· cited 2×
• Miles v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-12-07· cited 1×
• McDonald v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2004-09-16· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Hill v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1991-01-22· cited 9×