District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/12/2003
Hill v. State
Citations
- 839 So. 2d 865
- 2003 WL 1037885
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that an untimely motion for new trial leaves the court “without jurisdiction to consider the motion”
- conviction for burglary with intent to commit theft is not legally inconsistent with acquittal on petit theft charge
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: May
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Clinton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-11-14· cited 7×
- Bruce v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-11· cited 6×
- Tyrone B. Johnson v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-05-25· cited 5×
- Conrad v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-03-28· cited 3×
- Netrievae White v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-01-06· cited 2×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-05-30· cited 47×
- Mizell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-08-26· cited 22×
- State v. BoddenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-05-10· cited 11×
- Clifton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-08-08· cited 4×
- King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-12· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.