Hill v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A fingerprint is far from fungible. The value of a fingerprint lies in its unique pattern.”
• “A fingerprint card . . . may be admitted into evidence without the showing of a chain of custody since it can be readily identified by reference to the subject’s fingerprints.”
• “A fingerprint is far from fungible. The value of a fingerprint lies in its unique pattern. A fingerprint card, thus, may be admitted into evidence without the showing of a chain of custody since it can be readily identified by reference to the subject’s fingerprints.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Baxter v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1985-07-03· cited 99×
• White v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1997-05-12· cited 62×
• Catchings v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1986-09-03· cited 45×
• Goodman v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1985-11-27· cited 34×
• Hicks v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1986-03-11· cited 17×
• Duncan v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1986-11-05· cited 7×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1987-09-09· cited 5×
• Kuykendall v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-07-24· cited 4×
• Wright v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-06-16· cited 4×
• McLeod v. Barrett
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1999-10-18· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1983-04-25· cited 240×
• Ruffin v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1979-01-24· cited 82×
• Harper v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1983-06-28· cited 37×
• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1984-10-01· cited 15×