Skip to main content

Hill v. State

Citations

  • 570 S.E.2d 395
  • 257 Ga. App. 82
  • 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 2526
  • 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 1061

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is the description of the crime, rather than the description and number of the section under which it appears no crime and was void.
  • “It is the description of the crime, rather than the description and number of the section under which it appears in the Code[,] which furnishes the criterion for determining whether the indictment is good.”
  • “It is the description of the crime, rather than the description and number of the section under which it appears in the Code which furnishes the criterion for determining whether the indictment is good.”
  • “It is the description of the crime, rather than the description and number of the section under which it appears in the Code which furnishes the criterion for determining whether the indictment is good.”
  • “It is the description of the crime, rather than the description and number of the section under which it appears in the Code which furnishes the criterion for determining whether the indictment is good.” (punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mlkell, Andrews, Phipps

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.