Skip to main content

Hill v. State

Citations

  • 230 S.E.2d 336
  • 140 Ga. App. 121
  • 1976 Ga. App. LEXIS 1368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant’s incriminating statements should have been excluded, since “[t]hey were made shortly after an . . . illegal detention during which an unlawful search revealed what appeared to be stolen goods”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Bell, Stolz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.